<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perlin Color</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nodename.com/blog/2008/07/13/perlin-color/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nodename.com/blog/2008/07/13/perlin-color/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mario Klingemann</title>
		<link>http://nodename.com/blog/2008/07/13/perlin-color/#comment-142164</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario Klingemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nodename.com/blog/?p=61#comment-142164</guid>
		<description>Somehow the processing/frocessing implementation of Perlin noise looks a bit blocky to me. I think the reason is that they use cosine interpolation vs. the bicubic interpolation that the original implementation does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow the processing/frocessing implementation of Perlin noise looks a bit blocky to me. I think the reason is that they use cosine interpolation vs. the bicubic interpolation that the original implementation does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
